Given to committees shown
$13M
$13,000,000
Committees given to
1
first hop
Outside spenders reached
3
in this race
Independent expenditures
5
targeting edges · 7 nodes
Amounts past this donor's own gifts are the reported totals between the two parties, not this donor's share. Once money is pooled in a committee it is fungible, so how much of it reached any spender or ad is not determinable.
Forward walk
- BLOOMBERG, MICHAEL R.individual
- supported with $224 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗
- $539,000 →EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)FEC committeeoutside spender in this raceFEC record ↗
- opposed with $1,000,022 in IEs ⇢Dave McCormickcandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗
- supported with $5,289 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- supported with $3,048,486 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- opposed with $2,002,360 in IEs ⇢Dave McCormickcandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
Solid rows are money edges (the reported total between the two parties, not this donor's share). Dashed amber rows are independent expenditures: they name a candidate but move no money to them.
Ads run by committees in this walk
- VOTEVETS, which received $2,546,000 from HMP (pooled total, not this donor's share),ran 3 ads →
- LCV VICTORY FUND, which received $50,000 from HMP (pooled total, not this donor's share),ran 3 ads →
Ads are attached to a committee because Google's advertiser name matched its FEC registration. Ads ran alongside these money edges; the dollar figures past the donor's own gifts are the reported totals between the two parties, not this donor's share, and say nothing about which dollars paid for which ad.