Given to committees shown
$49M
$48,976,704
Committees given to
2
first hop
Outside spenders reached
5
in this race
Independent expenditures
6
targeting edges · 8 nodes
Amounts past this donor's own gifts are the reported totals between the two parties, not this donor's share. Once money is pooled in a committee it is fungible, so how much of it reached any spender or ad is not determinable.
Forward walk
- LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS, INC.organization
- supported with $3,048,486 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗
- opposed with $2,002,360 in IEs ⇢Dave McCormickcandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗
- supported with $496 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- supported with $2,670,700 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- supported with $1,272,157 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- supported with $110,126 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- $301,704 →GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTIONFEC committeeoutside spender in this raceFEC record ↗(expanded above)
Solid rows are money edges (the reported total between the two parties, not this donor's share). Dashed amber rows are independent expenditures: they name a candidate but move no money to them.
Ads run by committees in this walk
- LCV VICTORY FUND, which received $48,675,000 from this donor,ran 3 ads →
- BLACKPAC, which received $750,000 from LCV VICTORY FUND (pooled total, not this donor's share),ran 3 ads →
Ads are attached to a committee because Google's advertiser name matched its FEC registration. Ads ran alongside these money edges; the dollar figures past the donor's own gifts are the reported totals between the two parties, not this donor's share, and say nothing about which dollars paid for which ad.