TECHNICOLOR POLITICAL

vendor · #43 of 310 in Pennsylvania · U.S. Senate · 2024all Schedule E rows for this payee on fec.gov ↗
filed asTECHNICOLOR POLITICAL

inferred · rule case/punctuation/suffix normalisation + token-set ≥0.92 (numeric tokens must match); aliases filefec.gov ↗

Paid in this race
$206K
0.1% of outside spending
Buys
1
Oct 29, 2024
Spenders
1
committees reporting payments
Top medium
digital
100% of dollars

By medium

digital
digital 100%
$206K 1 buys

Medium is classified from the purpose the spender filed; the FEC does not record which buy placed which ad.

inferred · rule Medium is classified from the purpose string the spender filed on Schedule E, by an ordered keyword table (first match wins, keywords matched at word starts): production: produc, creative, design, videograph, photograph, filming; digital: digital, online, internet, web, social, streaming, email, youtube, facebook, google, meta, gif; radio: radio; tv: tv, television, broadcast, cable, media buy, media placement; mail: mail, postage, postcard, print; phones: phone, text, sms, robocall, call, dial, teleconferenc; consulting: poll, research, consult, strateg, list, targeting, voter file; field: canvass, door, field, gotv; other: no match. The FEC does not record which buy placed which ad.Schedule E fields ↗

Who paid this vendor

SpenderPaidBuys
BLACKPAC$206,1051

Candidates named on the buys

Targeting, not money: the spender declares support or opposition on each Schedule E row; the candidate receives nothing.

for Bob Casey $206K

Ads linked to this vendor

3 ads from 1 spender who paid this vendor. The FEC does not record which buy placed which ad; each link below says what it rests on.

inferred3 ads · derived by a stated rule, not on any filing
  • BLACKPAC · ran Oct 26, 2024 – Nov 5, 2024 · Only digital vendor BLACKPAC paid during this ad's run window (ran oct 26, 2024 – nov 5, 2024, counting buys dated up to 7 days before first shown) — inferred, not filed. BLACKPAC reported $206,105 in digital buys to TECHNICOLOR POLITICAL; Google ads are digital placements.source ↗
  • BLACKPAC · ran Oct 18, 2024 – Nov 5, 2024 · Only digital vendor BLACKPAC paid during this ad's run window (ran oct 18, 2024 – nov 5, 2024, counting buys dated up to 7 days before first shown) — inferred, not filed. BLACKPAC reported $206,105 in digital buys to TECHNICOLOR POLITICAL; Google ads are digital placements.source ↗
  • BLACKPAC · ran Oct 18, 2024 – Nov 5, 2024 · Only digital vendor BLACKPAC paid during this ad's run window (ran oct 18, 2024 – nov 5, 2024, counting buys dated up to 7 days before first shown) — inferred, not filed. BLACKPAC reported $206,105 in digital buys to TECHNICOLOR POLITICAL; Google ads are digital placements.source ↗

Spenders in the picture: BLACKPAC. Ad spend is the range Google publishes; the vendor totals above are filed dollars. The two are never added together.

Every buy

DateSpenderS/OTargetAmountMediumFiled payee · purposeSource
Oct 29, 2024BLACKPACSBob Casey$206,105digitalTECHNICOLOR POLITICAL · DIGITAL ADVERTISINGFEC ↗

Every Schedule E independent expenditure names a payee. Payee strings are normalised (case, punctuation, legal suffixes, token order), near-duplicates are folded with a difflib ratio ≥ 0.92 when their numeric tokens match, and hand alias rows from data/hand/<race>/vendor_aliases.json override the rule. Medium is classified from the purpose the spender filed (ordered keyword table in campaign_commons/vendors.py). The FEC does not record which buy placed which ad: vendor ↔ ad links are date-window adjacency (or single-digital-vendor inference) from campaign_commons.ads_enrich, each with its basis, and are only `verified` when a person found a source naming both. Totals are the filed amounts, grouped, never re-estimated.

Money and positions are shown side by side because they are public records about the same person. Proximity is not causation; we make no claim that any contribution produced any action.

Methodology