Given to committees shown
$28M
$28,000,000
Committees given to
2
first hop
Outside spenders reached
3
in this race
Independent expenditures
6
targeting edges · 7 nodes
Amounts past this donor's own gifts are the reported totals between the two parties, not this donor's share. Once money is pooled in a committee it is fungible, so how much of it reached any spender or ad is not determinable.
Forward walk
- SINGER, PAUL ELLIOTTindividual
- opposed with $8,795,913 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗
- opposed with $52,799,240 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- opposed with $34,126,789 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- supported with $12,168,529 in IEs ⇢Dave McCormickcandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗
- opposed with $1,045,500 in IEs ⇢Dave McCormickcandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
- supported with $893,310 in IEs ⇢Bob Caseycandidatetargeting edge — no money to the candidateFEC record ↗(expanded above)
Solid rows are money edges (the reported total between the two parties, not this donor's share). Dashed amber rows are independent expenditures: they name a candidate but move no money to them.
Ads run by committees in this walk
- SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND, which received $27,000,000 from this donor,ran 98 ads →
- KEYSTONE RENEWAL PAC, which received $500,000 from SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND (pooled total, not this donor's share),ran 15 ads →
Ads are attached to a committee because Google's advertiser name matched its FEC registration. Ads ran alongside these money edges; the dollar figures past the donor's own gifts are the reported totals between the two parties, not this donor's share, and say nothing about which dollars paid for which ad.